wtc 7 • nist flaws
wtc7 • demolition
Thousands of architects, engineers, and even demolitions experts have put their reputations and careers on the line to dispute the official government narrative supplied by NIST, that WTC 1, 2, and 7 "ultimately collapsed due to fires" - this is especially odd considering no plane impact or bombing occurred with building 7 (Shanksville's Flight 93 missed its target, but they pulled it anyway). The below footage demonstrates the identical natures of WTC 7 vs controlled demolitions of similar sizes, alongside a main tower collapsing in the same manner. The last video shows a high rise building burning to the core without collapsing - far exceeding the lack of burning visible on any of the towers. In this viral video, a closeup of the charges exploding one by one can clearly be seen (and heard).
> "WTC 7 collapsed primarily from normal office fires."
Throughout history, zero steel-framed high-rise buildings have ever collapsed from fires. We are told that on 9/11, three did: WTC towers 1, 2, and 7, which a plane didn't even hit. The 9/11 Commission Report (2004) did not mention WTC 7. After complaints from architects and engineers about this anomalous collapse being swept under the rug, the US Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began a formal WTC 7 study, initially attempting to blame internal diesel tank fires and denying free-fall collapse speed. However, with AE911 Truth pointing out calculations of free-fall speeds from video and that diesel fires could be ruled out by lack of smoke, NIST was forced to concede on both of these points before their final 2008 WTC 7 report. Still, NIST officially claimed that WTC 7 collapsed "primarily from normal office fires." By ignoring sheer studs and other structural components of this modern steel-frame building, NIST concluded that the failure of column #79 somehow initiated a sudden universal "progressive collapse." When probed by multiple organizations to see the data behind NIST's computer simulation to understand how they reached their conclusions, NIST denied these requests because they "might jeopardize public safety."   The science disputing the official government-funded NIST report is not only overwhelming, it's obvious - read more about what experts have to say.
> Foreknowledge of Collapse:
At least 60 firefighters demonstrated foreknowledge of the collapse of WTC 7 at 5:20PM. More than half of them spoke in certain terms (i.e. “is coming down” vs “might”). Considering no steel high-rise building in history had ever collapsed from fires (except the Twin Towers that morning), how were they so certain that this modern, 1987, 47-story, fireproofed steel-frame building would collapse? It seems they may have been told by somebody. Multiple news stations reported the collapse on TV well before it happened:
• ABC News - FOX News - BBC News - CNN News
> What was in World Trade Center #7?
The first step to understanding why WTC 7 had to come down lies within its contents. Most of building 7 was occupied by key financial institutions including the IRS regional council, Federal Home Loan Bank, and most notably the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). With the help of the SEC and the fact their investigative records were destroyed in the demolishing of WTC 7, Bush was able to clear $240 billion in securities via the Federal Reserve - the first time such power was exercised in presidential history. This means Bush and the Federal Reserve allowed an anonymous individual or individuals to be paid $240 billion dollars in US denominated funds without revealing their names, location or legal status. As it would turn out, the rest of the building was utilized by various factions of the CIA, complete with HQ for the US Secret Service - conveniently allowing these institutions to leave any documents or evidence in WTC 7 that they wanted to simply go away.
NIST • flaws
The National Institute of Standards and Technology was put in place by the Bush administration to write the heavily disputed and scientifically flawed 9/11 Commission Report, known as the official U.S. narrative cited by the U.S. government. While many esteemed professionals don't bother researching 9/11, the ones who do dare not risk their career and reputation by challenging the government. Still, thousands of architects and engineers have publicly pledged their support for 9/11 truth, advocating that NIST's official report on the collapses contains flawed science. Professional pilots from all over the world continue to contest the impossibilities in the hijacked airline routes alleged by NIST. Even NIST members themselves defected and resigned from the commission, publicly stating that they felt the government withheld critical information required to conduct a proper investigation and that they were set up to fail. If the NIST scientists and writers of the 9/11 commission don't even believe the government, why should we?
further reading links:
- Various facts above sourced, cited, & elaborated within the 2009 documentary "Loose Change: An American Coup"
- U.S. Airforce drills simulating hijacked airliners occurred on 9/11, confusing air traffic controllers
- Thoroughly cited & sourced compilation of NIST flaws and whistleblowers
- Documented Proof that the U.S. Gov't and others have orchestrated similar "false flag" attacks on themselves
- But Could This Really Happen in Modern America?
- 11 massive inconsistencies in the official 9/11 narrative
- 2000+ Architects and Engineers put careers on the line to advocate that controlled demolition is the only logical explanation
- What was in Building 7? [wtc7.net] • CNN Official List of Building 7 Tenants
- Destruction of WTC 7 "Secret CIA Site" acknowledged via NYTimes
- 9/11 Truth Megapost [reddit w/sources]
- "Steel Buildings Don't Collapse from Fire"